Hentzner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 district · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 41 Cal. 3d 714 - People v. Figueroa (1986), Doe v. State (2008)
1 district · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78O (§ 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Morissette v. United States · Screws v. United States · Spies v. United States · Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[consciousness on the part of the actor that he is doing the act does not carry with it an implication that he is aware that what he is doing is wrong. In such cases, more than mere conscious action is needed to satisfy the criminal intent requirement.... Thus, criminal intent in the sense of consciousness of wrongdoing should be re garded as a separate element of the offense!.]”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“The issue before us is the meaning of the word “wilfully” as used in AS 44.55.-210(a). There are several possibilities. One is that the defendant must act intentionally in the sense that he is aware of what he is doing; another is that the defendant must be aware that what he is doing is illegal; and a third is that the defendant must know that what he is doing is wrong. It is in this last sense that we think “wilfully” should be interpreted as it is used in Section 210.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kinney v. State · Wheeler v. State“In this chapter unless the context otherwise requires: (12) "security" means a note; ... evidence of indebtedness; ... investment of money or money's worth including goods furnished or services performed in the risk capital of a venture with the expectation of some benefit to the investor where the investor has no direct control over the instrument or policy decision of the venture; or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a "security"... .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.