Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 SO2D 1319 - State v. Johans

State v. Johans’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Melbourne v. State (1996), 782 So. 2d 343 - Muhammad v. State (2001)

74 state decisions

440199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Alimeg, Inc. v. Shlim · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · 522 So. 2d 18 - State v. Slappy · 525 So. 2d 875 - Holloman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a Neil inquiry is required when an objection is raised that a peremptory challenge is being used in a racially discriminatory manner.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A party concerned about the other side's use of peremptory challenges must make a timely objection and demonstrate on the record that the challenged persons are members of a distinct racial group and that there is a strong likelihood that they have been challenged solely because of their race.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he proper remedy in all cases where the trial court errs in failing to hold a Neil inquiry is to reverse and remand for a new trial.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.