Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 So. 2d 1330 - Wright v. Wright

613 So. 2d 1330 - Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2012

6 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 442 So. 2d 203 - Kuvin v. Kuvin · 453 So. 2d 1355 - US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Dept. of Ins. · 583 So. 2d 654 - Hamlet v. Hamlet · 432 So. 2d 666 - Campbell v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we stated in Geddes , the former husband's desire for the support obligation to be temporary must be balanced against the former wife's lost opportunities and ability to become self-supporting. The distribution scheme in the instant appeal enables the wife to leave this marriage at the age of thirty-nine with a great deal more than what she possessed when she entered it. Although we recognize that a short marriage alone does not preclude a permanent alimony award, the present record, considering her share of the equitable distribution, does not support that the wife is permanently without the means of self-support as a result of anything that transpired during the marriage. Kremer . Accordingly, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion when it awarded the wife permanent alimony....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.