¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions but agree with appellant and the state that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive mandatory minimum sentences under the circumstances of this case. See Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the sentences be made concurrent.
613 So. 2d 145
Prince v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 17, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-02-17
Relies on Daniels v. State
Decided 1993-02-17