¶1The appellant challenges his habitual offender sentence, arguing that the court failed to make the requisite findings under section 775.084, Florida Statutes. Because the appellant expressly agreed to be sentenced as a habitual offender, the necessity of specific findings under the statute was waived. See Cato v. State, 611 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Robinson v. State, 605 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The challenged sentenced is therefore affirmed.
613 So. 2d 147
Moffett v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 18, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-02-18
Relies on 605 So. 2d 500 - Robinson v. State · Cato v. State
Decided 1993-02-18