Nunez v. Mintz’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 393 So. 2d 301 - City of Plaquemine v. Medlen · Regira v. Falsetta · 405 So. 2d 850 - Regira v. Falsetta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statutes dealing with actions to challenge a right to office, LSA-R.S. 42:76 and LSA-R.S. 42:77, give an exclusive list of those who have a right of action to bring an intrusion-into-office action or writ of quo warranto: the attorney general, a district attorney, the governor, or someone who claims the office allegedly being intruded upon. Accord, City of Plaquemine v. Medlen, 393 So.2d 301 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1980) and Regira v. Falsetta, 405 So.2d 850 (La.App. 1st Cir.1981), reversed in part, 405 So.2d 825 (La.1981), appeal dismissed, 455 U.S. 914 , 102 S.Ct. 1267 , 71 L.Ed.2d 454 (1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.