Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 SO2D 509 - Persons v. Pelaez

Persons v. Pelaez’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 474 So. 2d 212 - Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co. · Phillips v. Parrish · 595 So. 2d 177 - Lee County v. Sager

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since prejudgment interest is merely another element of damages, it is properly included in determining whether a judgment is so deficient as to activate the provisions of section 768.79, Florida Statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “prejudgment interest is a part of the judgment in determining whether the award is below the level which activates entitlement to fees and costs pursuant to section 73.092(7), Florida Statutes (1987)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the total amount of money damages awarded plus the amount of costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the plaintiff or counter-plaintiff prior to the making of the offer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.