¶1AFFIRMED.
¶2concurring specially.
¶3In my view, admission of the “wallet from heaven” was error; however, after reviewing the trial transcript, including closing arguments, I conclude the error does not warrant reversal.
613 So. 2d 64
Decided January 8, 1993
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2001
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-01-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1AFFIRMED.
¶2concurring specially.
¶3In my view, admission of the “wallet from heaven” was error; however, after reviewing the trial transcript, including closing arguments, I conclude the error does not warrant reversal.