Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 SO2D 761 - Rigaud v. Deruise

Rigaud v. Deruise’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2014

5 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gonzales v. Xerox Corp. · 561 So. 2d 871 - Williams v. Olden · 539 So. 2d 979 - Rigaud v. Deruise

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f there is no timely challenge to the testing procedure or if the court finds there has been no procedural error in the testing procedure, the certified report shall be admitted into evidence at trial as prima facie proof of its contents, provided that the party against whom the report is sought to be used may summon and exam ine those making the original of the report as witnesses under cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.