Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 SO2D 893 - Hunt v. State

Hunt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably 761 So. 2d 269 - Robinson v. State (1999), 697 So. 2d 944 - State v. Frazier (1997)

29 state decisions

160199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Santobello v. New York · Doerr v. Doerr · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Martin v. Delaware

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A `constant factor' insuring basic fairness in the plea bargaining process is the requirement that `when a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled.' Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 , 92 S.Ct. 495, 499 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"When an agreement with the defendant has not been fulfilled, the defendant is entitled to specific performance of the unfulfilled promise or to withdrawal of [the] plea. Santobello, 404 U.S. at 263 , 92 S.Ct. at 499 . In this case, we believe that specific performance is the adequate remedy."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “significant beginning of a pattern of intimidation and terror inflicted on the witness to terrorize her and break down her will ultimately and obtain complete control of her, ultimately resulting in her carrying out the various crimes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.