Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 SW2D 617 - Stahl v. Commonwealth

Stahl v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2006

9 state decisions

70198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hammershoy v. Commonwealth · Cleaver v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the proper procedure is for the trial court to vacate the judgment and enter a new one, whereupon an appeal may be taken from the new judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.