Hull v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2006
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · Beck v. State of Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Sibron v. State of New York Peters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to justify an intrusion, by means of physical force or show of authority, however slight it might be, the officer involved must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which in light of his experience and general knowledge taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. State“a variety of terms to capture the elusive concept of what cause is sufficient to authorize police to stop a person,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marsh v. State“was without a particularized and objective suspicion of criminal activity on his part”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.