Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 F.2d 1229 - United States v. Krasn

United States v. Krasn’s Empirical Analysis

614 F.2d 1229 · 1980

Citation profile

159
cited by 159 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

117 federal appellate · 3 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 159 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2016 · most notably 117 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Lord (1992), United States v. Keller (1990)

117 federal appellate · 3 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 10 states

8501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Berger v. United States · United States v. Marion · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · United States v. Lovasco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n certain cases, the duty of good faith would encompass an obligation to inform a defendant during plea bargain negotiations of other possible criminal charges which may be filed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any dispute over the terms of the agreement is to be resolved by objective standards.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “What the parties agreed to 'is a question of fact to be resolved by the district court.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.