Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 F.2d 146 - Bailey v. Califano

Bailey v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis

614 F.2d 146 · 1980

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
February 1987
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Landess v. Weinberger · Thorne v. Califano · Veal v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The regulations specifically list functional nonpsyehotic disorders as an impairment. These disorders must be manifested by recurrent and persistent periods of anxiety with tension and apprehension which result in a restriction of daily activities and construction of interests and deterioration in personal habits and seriously impaired ability to relate to other people. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1501 , et seq., App. 1 § 12.04 (1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.