Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 F.2d 15 - Jackson v. Salon

Jackson v. Salon’s Empirical Analysis

614 F.2d 15 · 1980

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
January 2010
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt (1983), Resolution Trust Corp. v. Gold (1994)

22 federal appellate · 8 district ·

1701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1653 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Ferri v. Ackerman · General Electric Co. v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers · Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue) v. General Electric Company (Telechron Department, Ashland, Massachusetts) · Brennan v. University of Kansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Other courts have also held that court-appointed attorneys do not act under color of law (citing cases). Indeed, we know of no court of appeals which has held the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause the motion was received by the court after it had dismissed the complaint, it was too late for [plaintiff] to amend as a matter of right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.