Green v. Loggins’s Empirical Analysis
614 F.2d 219 · 1980
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2012 · most notably United States v. Thevis (1982), Perry v. New Hampshire (2012)
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not the primary purpose behind judicial review of tainted identification testimony.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““a court is obligated to review every pretrial encounter, accidental or otherwise, in order to insure that the circumstances of the particular encounter have not been so suggestive as to undermine the reliability of the witness’ subsequent identification.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“opportunity to view the perpetrator at the time of the crime”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.