Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 F.2d 415 - Johnson v. Bergland

Johnson v. Bergland’s Empirical Analysis

614 F.2d 415 · 1980

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
January 2014
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Vinieratos v. United States, Department of the Air Force ex rel. Aldridge (1991), Wilson v. Peña (1996)

28 federal appellate · 3 district ·

3701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans · De Medina v. Reinhardt · Ettinger v. Johnson · Hoffman v. Boeing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Otherwise, the complainant might be dilatory at the administrative level, knowing that he can get into federal court anyway.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “his administrative complaint was vacated because he failed to comply with the valid administrative requirement that he make his generalized complaints more specific.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “described general situations that could have occurred at any time; ... [and] did not set out any specific incidents or dates of discrimination”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.