Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 F.2d 624 - United States v. Collom

United States v. Collom’s Empirical Analysis

614 F.2d 624 · 1979

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably United States v. Booth (1981), United States v. Bautista (1982)

58 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

48019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Carroll v. United States · Chimel v. California · Beck v. State of Ohio · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he necessity, extent and character of additional instructions are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Stephen asserts that even though an arrest had not been made at this point, his statements to the officers should have been suppressed because Miranda warnings were not given. We disagree. We have held on numerous occasions that even though one’s freedom of action is inhibited to some degree during an investigatory detention, Miranda warnings need not be given prior to questioning in that circumstance. Id. at 628.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Supreme Court has recently defined reasonable suspicion to exist when the' detaining officer is “aware of specific articulable facts, together with rational inferences from those facts, that reasonably warrants suspicion” that the law is being broken. United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 884 [ 95 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 ] (1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.