Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 F.2d 75 - Stuckey v. Stynchcombe

Stuckey v. Stynchcombe’s Empirical Analysis

614 F.2d 75 · 1980

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
7
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2006 · most notably People v. District Court of the City of Denver (1983), Lowery v. Wj Estelle (1983)

7 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

220198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Bozza v. United States · United States v. Denson · Caille v. United States · Llerena v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not raise a federal constitutional claim cognizable in habeas corpus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.