Parks v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
614 F.2d 83 · 1980
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2007 · most notably Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (2000), Mitchell v. Schweiker (1983)
14 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Williams v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may, on motion of the Commissioner made for good cause shown before he files his answer, remand the case to the Commissioner for further action by the Commissioner, and it may at any time order additional evidence to be taken before the Commissioner, but only upon a showing that there is new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding; and the Commissioner shall, after the case is remanded, and after hearing such additional evidence if so ordered, modify or affirm his findings of fact or his decision, or both, and shall file with the court any such additional and modified findings of fact and decision, and a transcript of the additional record and testimony upon which his action in modifying or affirming was based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Secretary, as part of her answer to the suit, must file with the court a certified copy of the transcript of the record including the evidence upon which the findings and decision complained of are based. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). The court then has the authority to review the [Commissioner’s] decision upon the pleadings and transcript of the record. Id. (internal quotations omitted)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Such additional or modified findings of fact and decision shall be reviewable only to the extent provided for review of the original findings of fact and decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carry v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.