Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 F.3d 158 - Pierce v. Holder

Pierce v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

614 F.3d 158 · 2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Wilson · Pack v. Yusuff · Barden v. Keohane · United States v. Westmoreland · United States v. Bridges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Only the Attorney General, through the BOP, may compute a prisoner's credits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.