Carpenter v. Ries’s Empirical Analysis
614 F.3d 930 · 2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Missouri Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Patterson v. Shumate · Rousey v. Jacoway · Official Plan Committee v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Walker v. Treadwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No other provision of law, enacted before, on, or after April 20, 1983, may be construed to limit, supersede, or otherwise modify the provisions of this section except to the extent that it does so by express reference to this section.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Beaulieu v. Ragos · In re Suttice“Based on the legislative history of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, some bankruptcy courts ha[d] considered social security and [Social Security Income] benefits listed by the debtor to be income for purposes of a Chapter XIII bankruptcy. 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beaulieu v. Ragos“to open Chapter 13 to social security recipients” and permit”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Riggs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.