Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 P2D 800 - McGee v. State

McGee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZ (1992), Dunn v. State (1982)

28 state decisions

1001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Spinelli v. United States · Harris v. United States · Michel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has been said that in a search and seizure context probable cause does not mean "more likely than not" or "by a preponderance of the evidence," rather, the words connote something more akin to "reasonable cause." .... ... Where there is probable cause that a crime has been committed and also probable cause that a particular person committed it, we think a lesser degree of probability will suffice to justify temporary seizure of a weapon to determine if it was involved in the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] correct ruling of law by a trial court may be affirmed, regardless of the reasons advanced, if there exist independent grounds which, as a matter of law, support the trial court's conclusion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In dealing with probable cause, however, as the very name implies, we deal with probabilities. These are not technical; they are the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act. The standard of proof is accordingly correlative to what must be proved. “The substance of all the definitions” of probable cause “is a reasonable ground for belief of guilt.” And this “means less than evidence which would justify condemnation” or conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.