Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 So. 2d 398 - Benbow v. State

614 So. 2d 398 - Benbow v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2018

7 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Cronic · Houston v. Lack · Fallen v. United States · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Carr v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “this [c]ourt with authority to suspend the rule in post-conviction relief appeals, as in any other criminal appeal, and to allow an appeal to proceed despite apparently untimely notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In civil cases, we have refused to accept any excuse for not filing a notice in a timely fashion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.