614 So. 2d 486 - Ashley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
177 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 177 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 756 So. 2d 42 - Peart v. State (2000), 786 So. 2d 1173 - Carter v. State (2001)
177 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Mize v. State · 316 So. 2d 267 - Williams v. State · 597 So. 2d 256 - Koenig v. State · 609 So. 2d 598 - Massey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 177 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In sum, we hold that in order for a defendant to be habitualized following a guilty or nolo plea, the following must take place prior to acceptance of the plea: 1) The defendant must be given written notice of intent to habitualize, and 2) the court must confirm that the defendant is personally aware of the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization.”
19 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State · Major v. State“The defendant should be told of his or her eligibility for habitualization, the maximum habitual offender term for the charged offense, the fact that habitualization may affect the possibility of early release through certain programs, and, where habitual violent felony offender provisions are implicated, the mandatory minimum term.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State · Golden v. State“the mandatory minimum penalty provided by law, if any, and the maximum possible penalty provided by law.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Major v. State · Gonzalez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.