Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 SO2D 491 - Chiusolo v. Kennedy

Chiusolo v. Kennedy’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 675 So. 2d 915 - Med. Facilities Dev. v. Little Arch Creek (1996), Heights, Inc. v. Mustafa Atac (1999)

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

270199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 402 So. 2d 606 - State v. Hawkins · Depass v. Chitty · Cacaro v. Swan · 568 So. 2d 512 - Sparks v. Charles Wayne Group · 589 So. 2d 420 - Chiusolo v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fair nexus between the apparent legal or equitable ownership of the property and the dispute embodied in the lawsuit.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he statutory reference to injunctions exists merely to permit property holders to ask in an appropriate case that the plaintiff post a bond where needed to protect the former from irreparable harm. The bond requirement, whenever appropriate, is a vehicle for protecting the property holders just as the lis pendens protects the plaintiff and third parties.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a lien claimed under part I of chapter 713.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.