Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

614 So. 2d 51

Pope v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-03-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1997

2 state decisions

Relies on Slater v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for burglary with a battery and robbery. We reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for simple battery. See Slater v. State, 543 So.2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We do not need to remand this case for resentencing since the reduction in points resulting from our reversal of appellant’s conviction for battery does not change the permitted and recommended range of his guidelines sentence.

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

HERSEY and DELL, JJ., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Senior Judge, concur.
/614/so2d/51 · .json · Public domain