Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

614 So. 2d 547

Schmitt v. County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-01-26

Relies on Paul v. Davis · Farrar v. Hobby · ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish

Decided 1993-01-26

PER CURIAM.

¶1The order denying attorney’s fees is affirmed on authority of Couf v. DeBlaker, 652 F.2d 585 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921,102 S.Ct. 1278, 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); and Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, 712 F.2d 1524 (1st Cir. 1983); see County Line Joint Venture v. City of Grand Prairie, Texas, 839 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 890, 109 S.Ct. 223, 102 L.Ed.2d 214 (1988); Quinn v. Bryson, 739 F.2d 8 (1st Cir.1984); see also Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 96 S.Ct. 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976); Sharrow v. City of Dania, 83 So.2d 274 (Fla.1955). See generally Farrar v. Hobby, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).

¶2As to the cross-appeal, we affirm.

¶3Affirmed.

/614/so2d/547 · .json · Public domain