Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 So. 2d 755 - State v. Norrell

614 So. 2d 755 - State v. Norrell’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably State v. Pickett (1994), 682 So. 2d 777 - State v. Henton (1996)

28 state decisions

240199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · 535 So. 2d 1024 - State v. Madison · 606 So. 2d 891 - State v. Strother

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]actors which constitute essential elements of the offense of conviction or separate offense(s) for which defendant was convicted and sentenced shall not be considered aggravating circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the trial court finds one or more aggravating circumstances, then the grid range for the `typical case' is inapplicable and the trial court must exercise its reasoned discretion in determining the appropriate sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “While the word `should' is not mandatory, the guidelines clearly suggest that a trial court specifically consider the several aggravating factors which may warrant imposition of consecutive sentences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.