614 So. 2d 778 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2013
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hampton v. United States · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · Crisp v. Rubin · Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann · Scherl v. Fisher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“hesitate and local governments are regulated in their conduct towards individuals by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which provides, in pertinent part: ... No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [[Image here]]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“... [T]he governmental misconduct defense will be recognized only in the rarest and most outrageous circumstances. It requires not only government over involvement in the charged crime, but also a passive role by the defendant. A defendant who actively participates in the crime may not avail himself of the defense. State v. Kotwitz, 549 So.2d 351 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied, 558 So.2d 1123 (La. 1990); State v. Boyd, [548 So.2d 1265 (La. App. 2d 1989) ] supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.