Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 So. 2d 788 - State v. Brooks

614 So. 2d 788 - State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 607 So. 2d 872 - State v. Barnes · 605 So. 2d 231 - State v. Coleman · 609 So. 2d 1094 - State v. Brewster · 571 So. 2d 710 - State v. Vail

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant cannot appeal or seek review of a sentence imposed in conformity with a plea agreement which was set forth in the record at the time of the plea.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Guidelines and the 1991 implementing legislation adopt the view that a sentence in a particular case, which is acceptable to the prosecutor, defense counsel, and the trial court, should not be subjected to scrutiny by a reviewing court. [Footnotes omitted.] Inasmuch as the state, the defendant, and the trial court all agreed to the 30-year sentencing”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[N]o further justification is required under the Guidelines if a guilty plea agreement is reached by the parties and submitted to the court with a recommendation regarding a particular sentence or a range or “cap.” [Footnote omitted.] The Guidelines and the 1991 implementing legislation adopt the view that a sen-fence in a particular case, which is acceptable to the prosecutor, defense counsel, and the trial court, should not be subjected to scrutiny by a reviewing court. [Footnote omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.