Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 So. 2d 955 - Evans v. Trader

614 So. 2d 955 - Evans v. Trader’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2014

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Connor · 444 So. 2d 358 - Brown v. Credit Center, Inc. · United States v. Shaw · 542 So. 2d 871 - McFadden v. State · 599 So. 2d 559 - Barrett v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a governmental official has no immunity to a civil action for damages if his breach of a legal duty causes injury and (1) that duty is ministerial in nature, or (2) that duty involves the use of discretion and the governmental actor greatly or substantially exceeds his authority and in the course thereof causes harm, or (3) the governmental actor commits an intentional tort. Beyond that, a government official has no immunity when sued upon a tort that, has nothing to do with his official position or decision-making function and has been committed outside the course and scope of his office.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It would suffice to show that [the officer] acted with wanton and reckless disregard for [the plaintiff's] safety.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.