Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 614 S.W.2d 122 - Bell v. State

Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2018

22 state decisions

1101981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boyde v. State · Bray v. State · 147 Tex. Crim. 519 - Summers v. State · Lewis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he effect of [the prosecutor's] argument was to instruct the jury that only prosecuting attorneys seek to uphold truth and justice whereas defense counsel have a license to use any means to mislead the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Defense counsel is a criminal defense lawyer. He doesn’t have the same duty I do. He represents the criminal. His duty is to see that his client gets off even if it means putting on witnesses who are lying.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.