Foster v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2016
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Williams v. People of State of New York · Rose v. Clark · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judge should accord to every person who is legally interested in a proceeding, or his [or her] lawyer, full right to be heard according to law, and, except as authorized by law, neither initiate nor consider ex parte or other communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding. 12”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re WTL · In re W.T.L.“Accordingly, because nothing in the record suggests that the trial judge's initiation of an ex parte communication ... either biased the trial judge's opinion or caused the trial judge to receive ex parte information that appellant had no opportunity to challenge, we conclude the trial judge's violation of Canon 3(A)(4) did not substantially prejudice appellant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re WTL · In re W.T.L.“[a] trial judge generally may consider information from a wide variety of sources in evaluating the appropriate sentence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.