Sanchez v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
615 F.2d 1023 · 1980
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wise v. Lipscomb · Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plans even if submitted in response to a court order. As a result, the Court of Appeals found that the plan in this case is legislative and concluded that it is subject to the preclearance provisions of § 5. The court remanded the case for appropriate action and the District Court then ordered applicants to begin the § 5 procedures”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] proposed reapportionment plan submitted by a local legislative body does not lose its status as a legislative rather than court-ordered plan merely because it is the product of litigation conducted in a federal forum,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McDaniel v. Sanchez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.