Soliz v. Plunkett’s Empirical Analysis
615 F.2d 272 · 1980
Citation profile
21 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Castillo v. Givens (1983), Salazar-Calderon v. Presidio Valley Farmers Ass'n (1985)
21 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 2041
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Tcherepnin v. Knight · Peyton v. Rowe · Coca-Cola Company v. Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company · Weissinger v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to mean 27 any person, who, for a fee, either for himself or on behalf of another person, recruits, solicits, hires, furnishes, or transports ten or more migrant workers ... at any one time in any calendar year for interstate agricultural employment. 28 7 U.S.C. Sec. 2042(b). For present purposes, the key definitional terms are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any person, who, for a fee, either for himself or on behalf of another person, recruits, solicits, hires, furnishes, or transports migrant workers ... for agricultural employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Montelongo v. Meese“[A] person may not insulate himself from the provisions of the Act by simply conducting his activities through underlings who deal more directly with the workers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Montelongo v. Meese
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.