Smith v. No Galesburg Crown Finance Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
615 F.2d 407 · 1980
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Kilgo v. Bowman Transportation, Inc. (1986), Cowen v. Bank United of Texas, FSB (1995)
40 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Singleton v. Wulff · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · Huntington v. Attrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]trict compliance with the required disclosures ... is required.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Any creditor making a consumer loan or otherwise extending consumer credit in a transaction which is' neither a consumer credit sale nor under an open end consumer credit plan shall disclose each of the following items, to the extent applicable: (1) The amount of credit of which the obligor will have the actual use, or which is or will be paid to him or for his account or to another person on his behalf.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]pon compliance by the debtor with the provisions of the plan and upon completion of all payments to be made thereunder....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.