Fasano v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
615 F.2d 555 · 1980
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Reed v. Farley (1994), Knight v. United States (1994)
21 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Townsend v. Sain · Stone v. Powell · Hill v. United States · United States v. Hayman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Duval · Reed v. Farley“such egregious IAD violations that might present 'exceptional circumstances where the need for the remedy afforded by the writ of habeas corpus is apparent.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“not 'fundamental defects' indicating a 'miscarriage of justice'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.