Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 F.2d 648 - United States v. Antill

United States v. Antill’s Empirical Analysis

615 F.2d 648 · 1980

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Zurcher v. Stanford Daily · Martin Theatres of Texas, Inc. v. Bullock · New York Shipping Ass'n v. Federal Maritime Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] law enforcement officer may seize an item in plain view without a warrant if the officer (1) has an independent and legally sufficient justification for being in the position from which he can view the item, (2) immediately recognizes the item as evidence, and (3) discovers the evidence inadvertently.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.