Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 F.2d 886 - Hill v. R a Rolleri

Hill v. R a Rolleri’s Empirical Analysis

615 F.2d 886 · 1980

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably United States v. Rewald (1989), Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co. (1985)

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

3401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Mullen v. Torrance · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Rozier v. Ford Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (A) the activities of the office or agency, or (B) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, in criminal cases matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel, or (C) in civil actions and proceedings and against the Government in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.