Young v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
615 F.3d 59 · 2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Addington v. Texas · Kansas v. Hendricks · Foucha v. Louisiana · Kansas v. Crane · United States v. Pizarro-Berríos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the authoritative reference used in diagnosing mental disorders.” Young v. Murphy, 615 F.3d 59 , 61 n. 1 (1st Cir. 2010).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.