Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 F.3d 744 - Larson v. Astrue

Larson v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

615 F.3d 744 · 2010

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
December 2020
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Clifford v. Apfel · Craft v. Astrue · Holohan v. Massanari · Mason v. Shalala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Episodes of decompensation are exacerbations or temporary increases in symptoms or signs accompanied by a loss of adaptive functioning, as manifested by difficulties in performing activities of daily living, maintaining social relationships, or maintaining concentration, persistence, or pace. Episodes of decompensation may be demonstrated by an exacerbation in symptoms or signs that would ordinarily require increased treatment or a less stressful situation (or a combination of the two). Episodes of decompensation may be inferred from medical records showing significant alteration in medication; or documentation of the need for a more structured psychological support system (e.g., hospitalizations, placement in a halfway house, or a highly structured and directing household); or other relevant information in the record about the existence, severity, and duration of the episode. The term repeated episodes of decompensation, each of extended duration in these listings means three episodes within 1 year, or an average of once every 4 months, each lasting for at least 2 weeks. If you have experienced more frequent episodes of shorter duration or less frequent episodes of longer duration, we must use judgment to determine if the duration and functional effects of the episodes are of equal severity and may be used to substitute for the listed finding in a determination of equivalence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although everyone seemed to think that he or she knew what is meant by “episodes of decompensation,” this is not a self-defining phrase.... An incident— such as hospitalization or placement in a halfway house—that signals the need for a more structured psychological support system would qualify as an episode of decompensation, but so would many other scenarios. The listing recognizes than an episode may be inferred from medical records showing a significant alteration in medication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An ALJ must consider the length, nature, and extent of the treatment relationship; frequency of examination; the physician's specialty; the types of tests performed; and the consistency and support for the physician's opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.