Pafe v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
615 F.3d 967 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Iturribarria v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Holland v. Florida · Rodriguez-Lariz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Borges v. Gonzales · Lukowski v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the immigration context, the doctrine of equitable tolling is sparingly invoked for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mwangi v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.