Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 FSUPP 330 - Walters v. Thompson

Walters v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2005

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

70198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Wolff v. McDonnell · Elrod v. Burns · Bounds v. Smith · Rhodes v. Chapman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Legal research often requires browsing through various materials in search of inspiration; tentative theories may have to be abandoned in the course of research in the face of unfamiliar adverse precedent. New theories may occur as a result of a chance discovery of an obscure or forgotten case. Certainly a prisoner, unversed in the law and the methods of legal research, will need more time or legal assistance than the trained lawyer in exploring his case. It is unrealistic to expect a prisoner to know in advance exactly what materials he needs to consult.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that inmates may need to have access to legal resources in order to learn that they have a colorable claim as well as to frame a cause of action. A requirement that inmate plaintiffs be thwarted in their active pursuit of an existing lawsuit before they can bring an access-to-court claim assumes a degree of access to legal resources that may not exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Rather, when inmates have no access to a law library they must be provided with assistance by trained, skilled, and independent legal personnel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.