Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 Pa. 305 - Commonwealth v. Rosen

Commonwealth v. Rosen’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Estelle v. Smith · Minnesota v. Murphy · Buchanan v. Kentucky · New Jersey v. Portash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to trial, which is similar to a ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, [therefore] our standard of review ... is the same as that of a motion to suppress. The admission of evidence is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and our review is for an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “absent other considerations, a right or privilege once waived is always waived and [ ] the defendant who waives a right or privilege cannot thereafter object to the use that is made of the formerly privileged communications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.