Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 SO2D 112 - Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2012

15 state decisions

110199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · 455 So. 2d 944 - Swann v. City of Huntsville · 518 So. 2d 221 - Mason v. City of Vestavia Hills · 342 So. 2d 933 - Skelton v. City of Birmingham · Skelton v. City of Birmingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`interpreted narrowly to apply only to "fighting words.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[Fighting words] by their very utterance provoke a swift physical retaliation and incite an immediate breach of the peace.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “"(a)(1) Harassment. —A person commits the crime of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he: ".... "b. Directs abusive or obscene language or makes an obscene gesture towards another person."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.