615 So. 2d 1202 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “If a witness uses a writing, recording or object to refresh his memory for the purpose of testifying, either (1) while testifying, or (2) before testifying, if the court in its discretion determines it is necessary in the interests of justice, an adverse party is entitled to have the writing, recording or object produced at the hearing, to inspect it, to cross-examine the witness thereon, and to introduce into evidence those portions which relate to the testimony of the witness. . . .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 666 So. 2d 814 - Owens v. State

2. “The rule is well established that contemporaneous objection is necessary to preserve the right to raise an error on appeal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 650 So. 2d 1289 - MacK v. State

3. “elementary that, for preservation of error for review, there must be contemporaneous objections.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 841 So. 2d 1067 - Moody v. State