615 So. 2d 121 - Cameron v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2017
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quercia v. United States · Patton v. United States · Ex Parte Barber · 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State · 471 So. 2d 493 - Ex Parte Faircloth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the appellant did not use the 'magic words' ... in stating his objection, the court was sufficiently 'inform[ed] ... of the legal basis of the objection.' "). The record on appeal indicates that an attending physician, a registered nurse, and a licensed practical nurse all signed K.L.'s medical records. Briefly, we note that the patient-declarant statements appear to conform to Rule 803(4). With respect to the first prong of Biles , supra , "[a] patient's statement that she had been raped ... would certainly be pertinent to medical diagnosis and treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although the appellant did not use the 'magic words' ... in stating his objection, the court was sufficiently 'inform[ed] ... of the legal basis of the objection.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.