Zumbado v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
95 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 778 So. 2d 199 - Hyde v. State (1998), 728 So. 2d 691 - Farrior v. State (1998)
95 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Barker v. Wingo · Coolidge v. New Hampshire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Johnson v. State , 555 So.2d 818 , 819-20 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), this court noted the difference in `sufficiency' and `weight' as follows:”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daniel v. State · C.L.Y. v. State“Delays occasioned by the defendant or on his behalf are excluded from the length of delay and are heavily counted against the defendant in applying the balancing test of Barker .”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Walker · DB v. State“`[T]he credibility of witnesses and the weight or probative force of testimony is for the jury to judge and determine.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.