Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 SO2D 507 - State v. Porter

State v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Taylor v. Louisiana · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No peremptory challenge made by the state or the defendant shall be based solely upon the race of the juror. If an objection is made that the state or defense has excluded a juror solely on the basis of race, and a prima facie case supporting that objection is made by the objecting party, the court may demand a satisfactory racially neutral reason for the exercise of the challenge, unless the court is satisfied that such reason is apparent from the voir dire examination of the juror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he fact that the trial court did not articulate any factors in imposing the sentence is of no effect. The question is whether the record reflects an adequate basis for the sentence imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the state, is not sufficient reasonably to permit a finding of guilty of the responsive offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.